A straight answer on pricing, what you get for it, and when a fractional arrangement stops making sense compared with a full-time hire.
The question comes up on almost every first call, usually late and slightly apologetically. It should be the first question, so here is a direct answer.
The shape of the cost
A fractional arrangement buys senior judgement on a defined number of days per month. You are paying for decisions | system selection, vendor negotiation, roadmap, governance | not for hours at a keyboard. Most firms start with one to two days a month and adjust once the priorities are clear.
What it replaces
- A full-time senior hire that a mid-sized firm cannot keep busy or retain.
- Vendor-led decisions made without anyone independent in the room.
- Project overruns caused by nobody owning scope, usually visible in the build itself.
When to hire full time instead
If you have a permanent internal team of any size, a live multi-year transformation, and enough decision volume to fill a week, you need someone in the building. We will tell you that rather than stretch a retainer past its usefulness | and we are happy to help you recruit them.
Related services
Read next
Why You Should Engage an Independent Consultant Before Selecting Any Legal Tech
Vendor demos are sales exercises, not selection processes. Here is why independent advice is the cheapest insurance a law firm can buy before committing to new legal technology.
SecurityVibe-Coded Apps Are Reaching Production Faster Than They Are Being Tested
AI build tools let anyone ship a working app in a weekend. Here is what we find when we penetration test them, and what to do before yours goes live.
Facing something similar?
Book a 30-minute strategy call and we will tell you straight what we would do.
Book a strategy call